Quality management is a recent phenomenon but very
important for an organisation. Advanced civilizations that supported the arts
and crafts allowed clients to choose goods meeting higher quality standards
rather than normal goods. In societies where arts and crafts are the
responsibility of master craftsmen or artists, these masters would lead their
studios and train and supervise others. The importance of craftsmen diminished
as mass production and repetitive work practices were instituted. The aim was to
produce large numbers of the same goods. The first proponent in the US for this
approach was Eli
Whitney who
proposed (interchangeable) parts manufacture for muskets, hence producing the
identical components and creating a musket assembly line. The next step forward
was promoted by several people including Frederick Winslow Taylor, a mechanical engineer who sought
to improve industrial efficiency. He is sometimes called "the father of
scientific management." He was one of the intellectual leaders of the
Efficiency Movement and part of his approach laid a further foundation for
quality management, including aspects like standardization and adopting
improved practices. Henry
Ford was also
important in bringing process and quality management practices into operation in
his assembly lines. In Germany, Karl
Friedrich Benz, often
called the inventor of the motor car, was pursuing similar assembly and
production practices, although real mass production was properly initiated in
Volkswagen after World War II. From this period onwards, North American
companies focused predominantly upon production against lower cost with
increased efficiency.
Walter
A. Shewhart made a
major step in the evolution towards quality management by creating a method for
quality control for production, using statistical methods, first proposed in
1924. This became the foundation for his ongoing work on statistical quality
control. W.
Edwards Deming later
applied statistical process control methods in the United States during World
War II, thereby successfully improving quality in the manufacture of munitions
and other strategically important products.
Quality leadership from a national perspective has
changed over the past five to six decades. After the second world war, Japan
decided to make quality improvement a national imperative as part of rebuilding
their economy, and sought the help of Shewhart, Deming and Juran, amongst others. W. Edwards Deming championed Shewhart's ideas in
Japan from 1950 onwards. He is probably best known for his management
philosophy establishing quality, productivity, and competitive position. He has
formulated 14
points of
attention for managers, which are a high level abstraction of many of his deep
insights. They should be interpreted by learning and understanding the deeper
insights. These 14
points include key
concepts such as:
- Break down barriers between departments
- Management should learn their responsibilities, and take on leadership
- Supervision should be to help people and machines and gadgets to do a better job
- Improve constantly and forever the system of production and service
- Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement
In the 1950s and 1960s, Japanese goods were synonymous
with cheapness and low quality, but over time their quality initiatives began
to be successful, with Japan achieving very high levels of quality in products
from the 1970s onward. For example, Japanese cars regularly top the J.D. Power customer satisfaction ratings. In
the 1980s Deming was asked by Ford Motor Company to start a quality initiative
after they realized that they were falling behind Japanese manufacturers. A
number of highly successful quality initiatives have been invented by the
Japanese (see for example on this pages: Genichi Taguchi, QFD, Toyota Production System). Many of the methods not only
provide techniques but also have associated quality culture (i.e. people
factors). These methods are now adopted by the same western countries that
decades earlier derided Japanese methods.
Customers recognize that quality is an important
attribute in products and services. Suppliers recognize that quality can be an
important differentiator between their own offerings and those of competitors
(quality differentiation is also called the quality gap). In the past two
decades this quality gap has been greatly reduced between competitive products
and services. This is partly due to the contracting (also called outsourcing)
of manufacture to countries like India and China, as well internationalization
of trade and competition. These countries amongst many others have raised their
own standards of quality in order to meet International standards and customer
demands. The ISO
9000 series of
standards are probably the best known International standards for quality
management.
There are a huge number of books available on quality
management. In recent times some themes have become more significant including
quality culture, the importance of knowledge management, and the role of
leadership in promoting and achieving high quality. Disciplines like systems thinking
are bringing more holistic approaches to quality so that people, process and
products are considered together rather than independent factors in quality
management.
The influence of quality thinking has spread to
non-traditional applications outside of walls of manufacturing, extending into
service sectors and into areas such as sales, marketing and customer service.[2]
Customer focus
Since the organizations depend on their customers,
they should understand current and future customer needs, should meet customer
requirements and should try to exceed the expectations of customers.[4] An organization attains customer
focus when all people in the organization know both the internal and external
customers and also what customer requirements must be met to ensure that both
the internal and external customers are satisfied.[5] In many cases, companies can
institute a satisfaction measurement program that not only measures
satisfaction among external customers but also internal customers—employees.
Leadership
Leaders of an organization establish unity of purpose
and direction of it. They should go for creation and maintenance of such an
internal environment, in which people can become fully involved in achieving
the organization's quality objective.[4]
Involvement of people
People at all levels of an organization are the
essence of it. Their complete involvement enables their abilities to be used
for the benefit of the organization; however, the ultimate key decisions are
made by the project manager.[4]
Process approach
The desired result can be achieved when activities and
related resources are managed in an organization as a process.[4]
System approach to management
An organization's effectiveness and efficiency in
achieving its quality objectives are contributed by identifying, understanding
and managing all interrelated processes as a system. Quality Control involves
checking transformed and transforming resources in all stages of production
process.[4]
Continual improvement
One of the permanent quality objectives of an
organization should be the continual improvement of its overall performance,
leveraging clear and concise PPMs (Process Performance Measures).[4]
Factual approach to decision making
Effective decisions are always based on the data
analysis and information. An organisation must be ready to consider all facts
that an organization is surrounded by.[4]
Mutually beneficial supplier
relationships
Since an organization and its suppliers are
interdependent, therefore a mutually beneficial relationship between them
increases the ability of both to add value.[4]
These eight principles form the basis for the quality
management system standard
Artikelnya menarik sekali kak, aku juga mempunyai tulisan sejenis mengenai jurnal serupa yang bisa kakak kunjungi Disini Happy Sharing
BalasHapus